Sweeney tracker
Are the 2026–27 Magic measurably different from the 2025–26 Magic on the numbers from the Sean Sweeney series?
Every metric here comes from one of the series posts and is measured the same way it was for last season. Games played: 12. Last game: Nov 13. Rules locked: October 27, 2026.
Where each metric stands
| Metric | Status | False alarms, upper bound | 2026–27 to date | 2025–26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half-court scoringC2 · headline | Too early (12 of about 16 games) | up to 73% | 1.105 | 1.121 |
| Live-ball-turnover startsC1 | Too early (12 of about 14 games) | up to 80% | 7.6% | 8.2% |
| Points allowed after a makeC3 | Too early (12 of about 77 games) | up to 60% | 1.121 | 1.149 |
| Opportunity marginS1 | Shifted ↓ (worse), rule 3, first Nov 5 | up to 73% | −0.98 | +1.72 |
| Volume pointsS2 | Shifted ↓ (worse), rule 3, first Nov 5 | up to 67% | −1.11 | +2.01 |
| Location pointsS3 | No signal | up to 77% | −0.40 | +2.04 |
| Shooter identityS4 | No signal | up to 97% | −1.10 | −2.58 |
| Talent residualT1 · context | Too early (12 of about 17 games) | no backtest | −5.54 | −1.88 |
False alarms: the share of teams for which a rule fired when 2024–25 games were checked against their own 2023–24 limits. Teams that changed coaches were not removed, so the rate is an upper bound.
Beyond the series: how much has Orlando changed?
Ten measures of how Orlando plays, beyond the ones from the series. Each change is Orlando's season-to-date value minus its 2025–26 value. The rank compares it with every other team's change from its own 2025–26 season, by size. Unusual means one of the 3 largest changes among the 30 teams. It says how unusual a change is, not what caused it.
| Measure | 2026–27 to date | 2025–26 | Change | Size of change | Status | Returning players |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seconds per possession after a make or dead ballCompared with each opponent's usual | −0.3 | −0.1 | −0.2 | Changed more than 4 of the other 29 teams | Within the normal range this season | – |
| Rim attempt shareCompared with each opponent's usual | −7.9 | +3.2 | −11.1 | Changed more than 29 of the other 29 teams | Unusual | −11.4, changed more than 29 of the other 29 teams |
| 3PA rateCompared with each opponent's usual | +5.2 | −3.2 | +8.4 | Changed more than 29 of the other 29 teams | Unusual | +9.7, changed more than 29 of the other 29 teams |
| Passes per offensive possessionCompared with each opponent's usual | +0.31 | +0.02 | +0.30 | Changed more than 27 of the other 29 teams | Unusual | – |
| Offensive rebound rate | 26.0% | 25.0% | +1.0 | Changed more than 4 of the other 29 teams | Within the normal range this season | – |
| Defensive rebound rate | 75.7% | 75.6% | +0.1 | Changed more than 0 of the other 29 teams | Too early (12 of about 22 games) | – |
| Opponent rim attempt shareCompared with each opponent's usual | −5.3 | −0.3 | −5.0 | Changed more than 27 of the other 29 teams | Unusual | – |
| Opponent 3PA rateCompared with each opponent's usual | −1.3 | −2.8 | +1.5 | Changed more than 11 of the other 29 teams | Within the normal range this season | – |
| Forced turnover rateCompared with each opponent's usual | +0.3 | +0.4 | −0.1 | Changed more than 0 of the other 29 teams | Within the normal range this season | – |
| Opponent FT rate | 30.4% | 28.5% | +1.8 | Changed more than 11 of the other 29 teams | Too early (12 of about 14 games) | – |
| All ten together | – | – | 21.1 | Changed more than 27 of the other 29 teams | Unusual | – |
Rate changes are in percentage points. A row compared with each opponent's usual measures every game against what that opponent normally allows or produces, so its values are above or below that norm; it is used only where it makes the measure more stable. Returning players repeats the change for rim attempt share and 3PA rate using only players who shot for the same team in both seasons, ranked against the same measure for the other teams. All ten together is the sum of Orlando's squared changes, each divided by this season's spread of that change across the 30 teams; its change column shows that sum. These rules were locked on Nov 1, 2026. The first 5 games were played before then.
Context
| Measure | 2026–27 to date | 2025–26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offensive rating | 110.2 | 115.4 | −5.3 |
| Defensive rating | 114.7 | 114.8 | −0.1 |
| Net rating | −4.5 | +0.6 | −5.1 |
| Share of minutes to the top 7 players | 76.8% | 70.3% | +6.4 |
Does better defense still create easier offense?
“The better we play on offense, the better we defend. The better we defend, the better we play on offense.”
The post identified three useful metrics for seeing how good defense leads to good offense. Half-court scoring after a made basket or a dead ball is the one to watch.
Orlando points per possession after an opponent made basket or a dead ball, when the defense is likely set. Higher is better.
- 2024–25 games (width source)
- 2026–27 games
- Center line
- Natural process limits
- Rolling 10-game average (visual aid)
Center line: Orlando’s 2025–26 value from PBPStats totals. Limit width: game-to-game variation in 2024–25.
Table view
| Game | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 3 games, 2026-10-21 to 2026-10-25 | 1.033 | pre-lock |
| Oct 28 at TOR | 1.058 | |
| Oct 30 at TOR | 1.357 | |
| Nov 1 vs BOS | 1.044 | |
| Nov 2 vs WAS | 1.170 | |
| Nov 5 at PHO | 1.056 | |
| Nov 7 at GSW | 1.091 | |
| Nov 10 at SAC | 0.929 | |
| Nov 11 at UTA | 1.350 | |
| Nov 13 vs MIL | 1.100 |
Center 1.121 · limits 0.603 to 1.639
Share of Orlando possessions that start after an opponent live-ball turnover. Higher is better.
- 2024–25 games (width source)
- 2026–27 games
- Center line
- Natural process limits
- Rolling 10-game average (visual aid)
Center line: Orlando’s 2025–26 value. The lower limit sits below zero, so this chart can only flag a high value.
Table view
| Game | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 3 games, 2026-10-21 to 2026-10-25 | 7.5% | pre-lock |
| Oct 28 at TOR | 7.8% | |
| Oct 30 at TOR | 6.6% | |
| Nov 1 vs BOS | 6.6% | |
| Nov 2 vs WAS | 6.7% | |
| Nov 5 at PHO | 9.0% | |
| Nov 7 at GSW | 8.3% | |
| Nov 10 at SAC | 9.6% | |
| Nov 11 at UTA | 6.3% | |
| Nov 13 vs MIL | 7.2% |
Center 8.2% · limits -0.7% to 17.2%
Opponent points per possession right after an Orlando made basket. Lower is better.
C3 rests on about 24-35 opponent possessions a game after an Orlando make, and its split-half reliability is low (r = 0.35), so it needs about 77 games to reach reliability 0.5. It will read 'too early' for most of the season.
- 2024–25 games (width source)
- 2026–27 games
- Center line
- Natural process limits
Lower is better. Center line: Orlando’s 2025–26 value.
Table view
| Game | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 3 games, 2026-10-21 to 2026-10-25 | 1.130 | pre-lock |
| Oct 28 at TOR | 1.462 | |
| Oct 30 at TOR | 1.242 | |
| Nov 1 vs BOS | 1.167 | |
| Nov 2 vs WAS | 1.088 | |
| Nov 5 at PHO | 1.091 | |
| Nov 7 at GSW | 0.972 | |
| Nov 11 at UTA | 1.167 | |
| Nov 13 vs MIL | 0.774 |
Center 1.149 · limits 0.583 to 1.716
More shots, better shots, and who takes them
“...getting more shots, getting better shots than our opponent”
Location values use this season’s league results through the latest update, with Orlando left out. As more league games come in, those values are restated, so past points for opportunity volume and location move slightly. If a restatement ever withdraws a signal that already fired, the chart keeps the record of when it fired and when it was withdrawn.
Scoring opportunities (FGA + 0.44 × FTA) per 100 possessions, Orlando minus opponents. Higher is better.
- 2025–26 games
- 2026–27 games
- Center line
- Natural process limits
- Rolling 10-game average (visual aid)
Center line and limits: Orlando’s 2025–26 games.
Table view
| Game | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 21 vs ATL | −3.35 | pre-lock |
| Oct 23 vs MIN | −18.65 | pre-lock |
| Oct 25 at NYK | −6.38 | pre-lock |
| Oct 28 at TOR | −8.71 | |
| Oct 30 at TOR | −11.85 | |
| Nov 1 vs BOS | −6.64 | |
| Nov 2 vs WAS | +1.63 | |
| Nov 5 at PHO | −1.17 | rule 3 |
| Nov 7 at GSW | +26.48 | rule 1 |
| Nov 10 at SAC | +14.01 | |
| Nov 11 at UTA | +3.56 | |
| Nov 13 vs MIL | −2.54 |
Center +1.73 · limits −19.24 to +22.69
Points per 100 added by taking more scoring opportunities than the opponent. Higher is better.
- 2025–26 games
- 2026–27 games
- Center line
- Natural process limits
- Rolling 10-game average (visual aid)
Restated as league location values update.
Table view
| Game | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 21 vs ATL | −3.97 | pre-lock |
| Oct 23 vs MIN | −21.34 | pre-lock |
| Oct 25 at NYK | −7.36 | pre-lock |
| Oct 28 at TOR | −10.19 | |
| Oct 30 at TOR | −13.25 | |
| Nov 1 vs BOS | −7.41 | |
| Nov 2 vs WAS | +1.80 | |
| Nov 5 at PHO | −1.29 | rule 3 |
| Nov 7 at GSW | +28.27 | rule 1 |
| Nov 10 at SAC | +14.99 | |
| Nov 11 at UTA | +4.03 | |
| Nov 13 vs MIL | −2.86 |
Center +2.05 · limits −22.51 to +26.60
Points per 100 added by where the shots come from, valued at league rates for five broad locations. Higher is better.
- 2025–26 games
- 2026–27 games
- Center line
- Natural process limits
- Rolling 10-game average (visual aid)
Restated as league location values update.
Table view
| Game | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 21 vs ATL | +2.61 | pre-lock |
| Oct 23 vs MIN | −2.04 | pre-lock |
| Oct 25 at NYK | −2.45 | pre-lock |
| Oct 28 at TOR | +0.06 | |
| Oct 30 at TOR | +9.25 | |
| Nov 1 vs BOS | −4.91 | |
| Nov 2 vs WAS | +0.04 | |
| Nov 5 at PHO | +10.96 | |
| Nov 7 at GSW | −4.49 | |
| Nov 10 at SAC | −2.22 | |
| Nov 11 at UTA | −3.71 | |
| Nov 13 vs MIL | −4.28 |
Center +2.03 · limits −10.20 to +14.26
Shooter identity
This number moves with the roster. In the 2024–25 test it fired for 97% of teams, so start with the split. Mix is how returning players have changed where they shoot, holding their volume at last season’s level. That is the part closest to a coaching decision. Composition is everything else, including who is playing and Paolo Banchero’s absence.
2025–26−3.85
2026–27 to date+0.32
Change+4.16
Mix+0.31
Composition+3.86
Offensive shooter identity, points per 100 possessions. Largest mix contributions so far: Desmond Bane +0.66, Goga Bitadze −0.16, Anthony Black −0.12. 13 returning players.
Points per 100 added or lost by who takes the shots, using each shooter’s frozen preseason expectation. Higher is better.
- 2025–26 games
- 2026–27 games
- Center line
- Natural process limits
- Rolling 10-game average (visual aid)
Shooter expectations frozen before the season from 2021–22 through 2025–26 attempts.
Table view
| Game | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 21 vs ATL | +0.75 | pre-lock |
| Oct 23 vs MIN | −0.42 | pre-lock |
| Oct 25 at NYK | −3.43 | pre-lock |
| Oct 28 at TOR | +3.32 | |
| Oct 30 at TOR | +1.00 | |
| Nov 1 vs BOS | −6.81 | |
| Nov 2 vs WAS | +0.03 | |
| Nov 5 at PHO | −0.29 | |
| Nov 7 at GSW | −5.74 | |
| Nov 10 at SAC | +0.10 | |
| Nov 11 at UTA | −0.77 | |
| Nov 13 vs MIL | −0.99 |
Center −2.62 · limits −11.63 to +6.38
- 2026–27 to date (12 games)
- Running total
- 2025–26 value
Points per 100 possessions. The steps account for the same observed attempts in order; they are not separate causes. Gray ticks mark where each step ended in 2025–26.
Table view
| Step | 2026–27 to date | 2025–26 |
|---|---|---|
| Opportunity volume | −1.11 | +2.01 |
| Broad location | −0.40 | +2.04 |
| Location margin | −1.50 | +4.06 |
| Shooter identity | −1.10 | −2.58 |
| Shooter-adjusted margin | −2.60 | +1.47 |
| Remaining residual | −1.89 | −0.84 |
| Actual Net Rating | −4.49 | +0.63 |
- Location expectation
- Shooter-adjusted expectation
- Actual rating
Points per 100 possessions. On defense, lower is better. The gap between the shooter-adjusted expectation and the actual rating is the remaining residual, which the tracker does not assign to a cause.
Table view
| Row | Location | Shooter-adjusted | Actual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offense 2026–27 | 109.38 | 109.69 | 110.17 |
| Offense 2025–26 | 118.47 | 114.62 | 115.43 |
| Defense 2026–27 | 110.88 | 112.30 | 114.66 |
| Defense 2025–26 | 114.41 | 113.15 | 114.80 |
- Below the league value for that zone
- Above it
Each cell is a player's shooter-identity contribution in points per 100 team possessions: his frozen preseason expectation minus the league value for that zone, over the attempts he has taken. These are accounting contributions, not rankings or shot prescriptions. Blank cells have no attempts yet.
Table view
| Player | Rim | Non-rim 2 | Corner 3 | Above-break 3 | Free throw |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desmond Bane | −0.03 | +0.02 | +0.33 | +0.89 | +0.29 |
| Franz Wagner | −0.06 | −0.26 | +0.05 | −0.34 | +0.42 |
| Anthony Black | −0.07 | −0.53 | +0.09 | −0.23 | −0.19 |
| Wendell Carter Jr. | +0.55 | −0.02 | −0.03 | −0.12 | −0.17 |
| Tristan da Silva | −0.05 | −0.10 | +0.15 | −0.18 | +0.05 |
| Goga Bitadze | +0.21 | −0.03 | −0.21 | ||
| Jase Richardson | +0.03 | −0.02 | +0.10 | −0.08 | −0.03 |
| Jevon Carter | −0.05 | +0.01 | +0.12 | +0.04 | |
| Jalen Suggs | −0.02 | −0.09 | +0.03 | −0.06 | 0.00 |
| Paolo Banchero | −0.01 | −0.08 | 0.00 | −0.04 | −0.07 |
| Nikola Vučević | +0.02 | +0.12 | +0.02 | −0.02 | +0.01 |
| Jamal Cain | 0.00 | +0.01 | −0.04 | +0.02 | −0.02 |
| Alex Morales | −0.01 | 0.00 | +0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Colin Castleton | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Is the team playing to its roster?
“There’s obviously talent here - number of talented guys that I’m excited to coach.”
This metric provides context but doesn't give us direct signal. Its reliability estimate rests on 2025–26 alone and it has no backtest, because no earlier preseason DARKO ratings were saved. It also takes the rotation as given: it asks how Orlando played with the players who played, not whether the minutes went to the right players.
Net Rating minus the rating predicted from the roster’s DARKO ratings and actual minutes. Higher is better.
- 2025–26 games
- 2026–27 games
- Center line
- Natural process limits
- Rolling 10-game average (visual aid)
August 7, 2026 DARKO ratings and actual minutes; 2025–26 coefficients.
Table view
| Game | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 21 vs ATL | −9.14 | pre-lock |
| Oct 23 vs MIN | −23.61 | pre-lock |
| Oct 25 at NYK | +6.71 | pre-lock |
| Oct 28 at TOR | −29.03 | |
| Oct 30 at TOR | +6.94 | |
| Nov 1 vs BOS | −13.25 | |
| Nov 2 vs WAS | −8.72 | |
| Nov 5 at PHO | −13.40 | |
| Nov 10 at SAC | +7.42 | |
| Nov 11 at UTA | +15.23 | |
| Nov 13 vs MIL | +5.02 |
Center −1.98 · limits −47.28 to +43.33
Who played
| Game | Banchero | Wagner | Bane | Suggs | Carter | Isaac | Black | Vucevic | da Silva | Penda | Richardson |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21 vs ATLPre-lock | 41 | 30 | 33 | 32 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 28 | 0 | 14 |
| Oct 23 vs MINPre-lock | 26 | 33 | 27 | 34 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 29 | 0 | 14 |
| Oct 25 at NYKPre-lock | 0 | 38 | 35 | 34 | 33 | 0 | 26 | 15 | 27 | 0 | 17 |
| Oct 28 at TOR | 0 | 34 | 34 | 0 | 26 | 0 | 22 | 16 | 31 | 0 | 14 |
| Oct 30 at TOR | 0 | 39 | 39 | 0 | 39 | 0 | 31 | 6 | 23 | 0 | 33 |
| Nov 1 vs BOS | 0 | 40 | 40 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 33 | 8 | 35 | 0 | 26 |
| Nov 2 vs WAS | 0 | 38 | 36 | 0 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 32 | 0 | 29 |
| Nov 5 at PHO | 0 | 38 | 32 | 0 | 34 | 0 | 31 | 4 | 30 | 0 | 26 |
| Nov 7 at GSW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 10 at SAC | 0 | 38 | 36 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 33 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| Nov 11 at UTA | 0 | 39 | 34 | 0 | 28 | 0 | 39 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
| Nov 13 vs MIL | 0 | 36 | 35 | 21 | 30 | 0 | 37 | 11 | 31 | 0 | 0 |
Minutes from PBPStats. Chart tooltips also list who did not play.
The posts behind the metrics
- 1
How Much "Talent" Does Sean Sweeney Inherit?
The first post in a series that breaks down some comments from new Magic head coach Sean Sweeney in his introductory press conference. I'll be looking to quantify the statements, as well as set a framework for evaluating how the team is performing under his leadership according to his stated goals.
- 2
Shot Economy: More and Better
In this post we look into the frequency and broad-location value of Orlando's shot attempts relative to their opponents in order to set a baseline against which we can evaluate Sweeney's stated desire for more and better shot opportunities.
- 3
How Much Offense Can Orlando's Defense Create?
No advanced stats are needed to tell us that Orlando's offense needs to show a leap this season if a postseason run is the goal.
- 4
What is a floor raiser, and does Orlando have one?
Exploring the concept of a floor raiser and its relevance to the Orlando Magic's roster decisions.
Methods and limitations
The rules were locked on October 27, 2026, before any 2026–27 value was computed, and amended once the same day. Definitions match the series posts. One possession count is used everywhere: PBPStats counted possessions, one shared count per team-game.
Detection
For T1 and the shot-economy metrics, the center line is the mean of Orlando’s 2025–26 game values. For the complementary-game metrics it is Orlando’s 2025–26 PBPStats season value, with limit widths from 2024–25 games, because PBPStats does not serve per-game possession starts for 2025–26. Limits sit 2.66 average moving ranges from the center and never change during the season.
When a season-to-date value means much
Split-half reliability across all 30 teams (2023–24 through 2025–26; T1 from 2025–26 only), stepped up with the Spearman-Brown formula, gives the games each metric needs before its season-to-date value reaches a reliability of 0.5.
| Metric | Games to reliability 0.5 | Orlando 2024–25 vs 2023–24 | Teams with any rule firing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Half-court scoring C2 | 16 | none | up to 73% |
| Live-ball-turnover starts C1 | 14 | rule 1 (better) | up to 80% |
| Points allowed after a make C3 | 77 | rule 1 (better) | up to 60% |
| Opportunity margin S1 | 12 | none | up to 73% |
| Volume points S2 | 12 | none | up to 67% |
| Location points S3 | 11 | rule 1 (worse), rule 2 (worse), rule 3 (worse) | up to 77% |
| Shooter identity S4 | 2 | rule 1 (better), rule 3 (better) | up to 97% |
| Talent residual T1 | 17 | not run | no backtest |
What these numbers cannot see
- DARKO ratings describe expected performance, not latent talent, and rookies start near a common baseline.
- Broad shot location is not shot quality. It does not see openness, defender distance, shot clock or difficulty within a zone.
- The shot-economy terms are accounting over the same attempts, not causes. The residuals are unexplained and are not assigned to coaching.
- Possession-start type does not see cross-matches, floor balance, shot clock or the first action.
Sources
PBPStats for possessions, points, possession starts and minutes; NBA play-by-play through nba_api for shots; DARKO for player ratings (July 8, 2025 and August 7, 2026 snapshots, frozen). Raw data stays private. This page shows derived values only.