PUBLIC BETA · SUPPORTED PLAYER-SEASONS

Counterfactuals

Pick a player and move some of his field-goal attempts between four broad floor areas.

Only the two selected shot shares change. Total field-goal attempts and the player's prior shooting expectation in each zone stay fixed.

[01]

Observed player-season

Pick a player-season

The supported set includes 447 players and 1,147 observed player-seasons. Availability depends on prior zone history and historical peer support.

Each zone's expected value comes only from seasons before the one selected here.

[02]

Edit

Set the transfer

The lists include only source and destination zones supported for this player-season.

How much shot share moves?
points

Non-rim 2
Rim

[2A]

Mechanical output

Mechanical expected-value change

+0.0

expected points / 100 FGA

Player-specific prior expectation

The calculation keeps this player's pre-season zone expectations and total field-goal attempts fixed.

Arithmetic

[03]

Shot profile

Current vs counterfactual

The court has the same four broad zones as the calculation. It does not estimate an exact shot location inside any zone.

CurrentCounterfactual
Four-zone shot profileA half court divided into rim, non-rim two, corner three, and above-break three zones.RIM0.0%unchangedNON-RIM 20.0%unchangedCORNER 30.0%unchangedABOVE-BREAK 30.0%unchanged
The dashed neutral zone is the source. The blue-outlined zone is the destination. Labels show before → after; pp means percentage points.

Rim

0.0%
0.0%

Non-rim 2

0.0%
0.0%

Corner 3

0.0%
0.0%

Above-break 3

0.0%
0.0%

[04]

Plausibility

Plausible?

How does this compare with similar players?

Well within comparable player history

Current profile
Proposed profile
Current distance
Proposed distance
Typical-range cutoff (P80)
Most unusual observed

The comparison uses the full four-zone shot profile and the five closest historical profiles in the fixed peer group. Distances are measured in percentage-point space.

Rim marginal peer range
0%25%50%75%100%

Current · Counterfactual

The whole-profile result above uses all four zones. This range shows the selected destination alone. The thin line is the full observed range; the heavy line is its middle 80%.

[05]

Historical context

Closest observed profiles

These are re-ranked by shot distribution and season-normalized offensive shot volume after each edit.

The nearest profile may still be far away.

    The primary match uses four shot shares plus FGA / 36. It does not compare player quality or expected performance, and it does not show that the edited profile would work in games.

    [06]

    Boundary

    Not established

    This calculation does not answer the questions below.

    • That the requested shot mix is realistic for this player.
    • That the player would keep the same shooting efficiency in games.
    • That teammates or opponents would respond in the same way.
    • That the mechanical difference would become additional game points.
    • That team Net Rating would change by this amount.
    • That a coach could create the requested mix.
    Methods / assumptions

    Held fixed in the calculation:

    • Total field-goal attempts stay the same.
    • The player's prior expected conversion in each shot zone stays the same.
    • Free throws, turnovers, offensive rebounds, minutes, and usage stay the same.
    • Teammates, opponents, role, defensive attention, and shot difficulty within each zone stay the same.
    • The calculation does not try to explain how the player would create the new attempts.

    The player list covers supported higher-volume rotation seasons, not every NBA player. The plausibility label compares the complete four-zone profile with five-neighbor distances inside the selected player's fixed historical peer set.